Difference Between DHI and FUE

Difference Between DHI and FUE

Updated at Jul 27, 2023
hair restoration

Direct hair implantation (DHI) and Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) are the two most common types of hair transplant treatments (FUE). Each has its own set of advantages. Before deciding on a hair transplant clinic, evaluate the distinctions between the two.

What is FUE Hair Transplant?

You’ve probably had it, but what is a Fue hair transplant? Individual follicles are harvested from the donor region and implanted into the recipient area using FUE (follicular unit extraction). The doctor makes small holes in the skin and then inserts hair transplants into the skin or scalp.

FUE hair transplant surgery is a common operation nowadays, with many patients going for it. In contrast to the standard FUT (or Follicular Unit Transplantation) surgery, which entails removing a strip of skin to harvest the grafts, FUE grafts are created straight from the scalp. The most important factor is that the FUE procedure leaves no visible scars and creates natural-looking results.

The initial step in FUE hair transplant surgery is to extract individual groups of 1-4 hair follicles, known as grafts, and place them in a storage solution. After the extraction phase, the doctor employs tiny blades to enlarge the channels.

Patients who have had FUE hair transplant surgery should anticipate to observe hair growth outcomes two months following the treatment on average. More considerable increase will be shown after 6 months, with a full outcome predicted in 12-18 months.

What is DHI Hair Transplant?

DHI (direct hair implantation) is a process of implanting hair into the scalp with a specific pen. Rather of manually making incisions in the scalp, grafts of up to five hairs are injected into the scalp at once using a specific equipment.

In the first phase, the hair follicles are removed with a specialized instrument with a diameter of 1 mm or even less.

The hair follicles are then put into a device known as the Choi Implanter Pen, which implants them directly into the recipient region. It injects grafts, which are clusters of hairs, straight into the scalp. This offers the doctor a lot of control over where the hairs are placed.

It also provides more comfort in controlling the angle, direction, and depth of freshly transplanted hair. DHI has a recovery time that is comparable to FUE. Typically, it takes between 12 and 18 months. In reality, the type of hair transplant technique has little effect on hair restoration time.

What Is the Difference Between FUE and DHI?

Both Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Direct Hair Implantation (DHI) are sophisticated methodologies employed in the realm of hair transplantation. Although they exhibit resemblances, there exist conspicuous disparities between the two entities. The comprehension of these disparities can assist individuals in making well-informed choices when contemplating hair rejuvenation alternatives. Allow us to embark upon an exploration of the disparities between the techniques known as Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Direct Hair Implantation (DHI).

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) entails the meticulous extraction of singular hair follicles from the designated donor region through the utilisation of a highly specialised punch instrument. Subsequently, these follicles are meticulously transplanted into the designated recipient region, wherein alopecia has manifested its presence.

DHI, short for Direct Hair Implantation, represents a sophisticated iteration of the Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) technique, wherein a proprietary Choi Implanter Pen is ingeniously integrated. The utilisation of this particular writing instrument facilitates the immediate insertion of collected hair follicles into the designated region without the prerequisite of performing lacerations in advance.

The process of implantation: Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE): Within the realm of FUE, after the extraction of hair follicles from the designated donor region, they are subsequently preserved in a solution for safekeeping until the recipient area is duly prepared. Minuscule lacerations are meticulously created within the designated region, whereby the extracted follicles are subsequently delicately positioned within these lacerations.

Utilising the innovative technique of Direct Hair Implantation (DHI), the meticulously harvested hair follicles are promptly and precisely transplanted into the designated recipient region by means of the esteemed Choi Implanter Pen. The utilisation of this writing instrument affords one with the ability to exercise meticulous command over the profundity, inclination, and orientation of insertion, culminating in an outcome that is imbued with a heightened semblance of authenticity.

The graft survival rate of FUE may be slightly lower in comparison to DHI due to the temporal gap between extraction and implantation. Nevertheless, when executed by proficient individuals, the disparity is inconsequential.

DHI, or Direct Hair Implantation, entails the expeditious implantation of the extracted hair follicles, thereby resulting in a comparatively elevated rate of graft survival. The diminished duration spent beyond the confines of the physical form amplifies the prospects of prosperous follicular proliferation.

Which is superior, DHI or FUE?

The determination of whether DHI or FUE is superior is contingent upon individual circumstances, the pattern of hair loss, and personal predilections. Both methodologies possess inherent virtues and are capable of bestowing exceptional outcomes. When contemplating the selection between DHI and FUE, it is imperative to take into account several salient factors.

DHI, also known as Direct Hair Implantation, represents a streamlined procedure that obviates the necessity of generating incisions in a discrete manner. By virtue of this, the diminution of the overall procedural duration can be achieved, thereby proffering a more expedient and efficacious encounter.

The process of Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) may necessitate an extended duration owing to the establishment of recipient site incisions. Nevertheless, the total duration shall be contingent upon the magnitude of the undertaking and the quantity of grafts.

The rate of graft survival is a crucial metric to assess the long-term viability and success of a transplant procedure.

DHI: The immediate implantation approach employed by DHI has the potential to engender a heightened rate of graft survival, given that the follicles endure a minimal duration outside the corporeal vessel. Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE): Albeit FUE may exhibit a marginally diminished graft survival rate, the disparity is generally inconsequential when executed by adept surgeons.

In the ultimate analysis, the determination between DHI and FUE ought to be rendered in conjunction with an expert who can evaluate your idiosyncratic requisites and furnish bespoke counsel. Every methodology possesses its inherent merits, and the appropriateness may fluctuate contingent upon idiosyncratic factors pertinent to the individual undergoing the aforementioned procedure.

Is DHI more expensive than FUE?

Usually, DHI operations cost more than FUE, and additionally it is slower. This is why many patients prefer FUE over DHI depending on the circumstance.

Turkey FUE hair transplant

If you are looking for a cost-efficient way of recovering hair, Turkey might be the best option. This is because Turkey hair transplant cost per graft is very low, in contrast to other European countries. You can check the Hair transplant in Istanbul reviews through Asmed’s website, and explore the recovery options for your hair. Our professionals are always here to help you throughout your hair transplant journey.

Get a Free Consultation!

Book A Consultation Results Video Results